Monitoring Change


By further developing students interrogative skills through the integration of Process Drama into the Reading / Literacy program will Reflective Discussion and Critical Literacy improve? Will this improvement be reflected in the their inferential and evaluative scores in Probe? Or just in their ability to verbally, during audio recording, offer multiple deep responses to one question? Will, adding in a new form of Process Drama (MoE) be advantageous for the students or benefit only the teachers desire to continually invigorate practice? 

I do believe adding in Mantle of the Expert (MoE) will not only give another avenue for development of interrogative skills BUT also another method of inquiry AND a starting pathway into the new Aotearoa NZ Histories curriculum.  I have created a presentation where the history of Bastion Point is researched and discussed looking at the use and misuse of power. Following the input and understanding of this historical information, how it has affected Auckland (know) the students become the experts (MoE) (do) and re-devise a plan for the area that would have allowed Ngati Whatua to retain their Marae, their whares and continue to live in a community that is healthy, safe and supportive of Maori tikanga. It is at this time MoE and other forms of process drama will be inserted to allow the students to share their information / research / planning from the perspective of the 'expert'.

To keep track and monitor any changes there will audio recordings of three different sessions: beginning, middle and end. Following these I will code each recording according to each question, the number of reiterations from a single question and the increased use of topic appropriate vocabulary. At the end of the inquiry students will be re-Probed to see if there is any significant change in reading levels. 


During the process if, anecdotally, the iterations and topic related language being used is not improving tweaking will be made and more types of process drama added (like Hot Seating) to areas where it can be used to bolster and support the MoE. Fortunately, MoE does allow for a fluid use of differing processes dependant on the level and understanding of the student and if they may need more support for understanding and perspective. 


During each session interesting ideas, vocabulary and wonderings are written on the white board. These are always photographed and added to the Slides being used. This allows me to not only reflect at a later time but also acts as a resource bank for the students to use as a follow up. Notes are also added under each slide in 'speaker notes' as a reflection of the lesson, the positives, negatives and changes that need to be made or considered. 

The implementation of this new inquiry method is going to be an excellent way forward for my practice and understanding not only of how to successfully plan and implement MoE but also but also getting my head around the new Aoteroa NZ Histories curriculum. 



 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evaluation

Image
 Following on from Monitoring, Recording and Tweaking I finally feel I have some semblance of data. So moving forward... Can the specific and deliberate use of two types of process drama not only improve  Reflective Discussion  amongst reluctant contributors but also  Critical Literacy? The work we did as a class on Ahi Ka , Bastion Point was a personal test of the new Aotearoa New Zealand Histories Curriculum . It allowed us to view both the Nonfictional and Fictional side of Bastion Point from the burial of Michael Joseph Savage to the land occupation. Where:                               I used a type of Drama called ' Mantle of the Expert' (MoE) along with ' Hot Seating'.   MoE allows the student to take on the role of the expert, research, create and present their understanding. Hot Seating allows students to question and find out more information through interrogation. As disc...
Read more

What's going on?

Image
Can development of my students Inferential and Evaluative comprehension skills by integrating Process Drama into the Reading Program improve their Critical Literacy and consequentially their Reading Age? The key question for my Inquiry! For the design and development of a program in response to this question I knew I needed to include both fiction and non fiction, books, articles, short movies/animations... any kind of media I could find that was appropriate and also engaging. Text that could be developed further and had strong themes running through them.  The text/media also needs to support the insertion of process drama throughout creating a link that flows appropriately building understanding of the character, plot and differing perspectives. Alternatively, for non fiction, using dramatic inquiry based tools such as 'Mantle of the Expert.'  Implementation of my change in practise will be noted within each presentation where the text/media will be available alongside the l...
Read more

Pennies for Hitler

Image
“Please keep reading!”  When you hear that you know it’s a goodie!   An afternoon shared book becomes a high stakes piece of classroom literacy and motivation.   Another example of integrating Mitey into the curriculum. Pennies for Hitler, by Jackie French...A story steeped in history just begging to be ripped apart through process drama baring the concepts of war, loss, grief, new beginnings, kindness, compassion and courage. The story explores the ideas of discrimination, hatred and fear of being different. There is the ongoing idea that while hatred is contagious so is love. Discussion was in-depth while writing became purposeful with highly descriptive language articulating the pain and suffering of those caught up in the era. Non-writers became silently obsessed patiently waiting to share their work. Critical moments, in a section of the story, were examined, rationalised for significance, re-created through process drama and expressed in clay. Through hot seating s...
Read more